Author(s)
On 16 November 2022, the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council (IIAC) published its “COVID-19 and Occupational Impacts” paper.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the IIAC has been continually reviewing and assessing the rapidly accruing scientific evidence on the occupational risks of COVID-19 and an interim position paper was published in February 2021.
In its recently published paper, the IIAC has identified what it considers to be robust evidence for the prescription of five serious pathological complications following COVID-19 which have been shown to cause persistent impairment and loss of function in some people. The complications are as follows:
The paper further acknowledges that some people may report one or more of a wide range of persisting symptoms following COVID-19 (described as Post-COVID Syndrome or long COVID) which may impact on their daily activities including their work ability. However, as current understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, temporal course, and predictable effects of the key symptoms of Post-COVID Syndrome is limited, as is the ability to diagnose the condition objectively, the IIAC considers that the evidence is not, at present, sufficient to recommend prescription for this syndrome.
It is widely acknowledged that the pandemic is ongoing, and it can be expected that more and better evidence on the long-term adverse health consequences of COVID-19, and on the association with occupational exposure, will emerge. The IIAC will thus continue to monitor the scientific literature and reported data (including analyses of death and infection data for 2021 and 2022) and expects to carry out a further review in the not too distant future.
On 10 April 2024, the High Court handed down its decision in Williams-Henry v Associated British Ports Holdings Ltd [2024] EWHC 806 (KB). In that judgment the presentation of the Claimant’s claim for personal injury was considered fundamentally dishonest and so was dismissed under section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (“the 2015 Act”). In considering whether…
After the introduction of the reforms to the Civil Procedure Rules in 2013, you may recall some judges becoming, at least initially, excited about the prospect of experts giving evidence concurrently (so-called “hot tubbing”). Since that early flush of excitement, I have been involved in only one trial in which it was used and I…
Provisional damages operate as an exception to the general rule that damages are assessed on a once-and-for-all basis. Where a claimant finds themselves at a risk of developing a disease or deterioration in their physical or mental condition in the future, the general rule would require the court to assess that risk and compensate the…
