06 Nov 2020
Paris: Match Postponed
Author(s)
Tag(s):
Last month nothing happened and that matters.
The International Conference on Concussion in Sport (organised by the Concussion in Sport Group) is a key meeting at which, on a broadly quadrennial basis, a group of approximately 40 experts explore and review the developments in sports related concussion injuries. The 6th Conference was due to take place in Paris over the last week in October 2020 but, on account of COVID-19, has been re-scheduled a year from now.
Following the 1st Conference, which took place in Vienna in 2001, the Group’s Consensus Statement was published, providing recommendations for the improvement of health and safety of athletes who suffer concussive injuries in rugby, football, hockey and other sports. The Statement has been updated and revised following each subsequent Conference (the latest version can be read here) and the current Side-line Concussion Assessment Standard (SCAT5) was updated following the 5th Conference, which took place in Berlin in October 2016.
It is noteworthy that the Group’s previous Statement reached the consensus that a cause and effect relationship between chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and sports-related concussion had not yet been demonstrated. Whether that consensus will hold now falls to be reviewed in October 2021 in the face of a tension between that ‘2016 consensus’ on the one hand and large settlements that have been reached in some arenas (both sporting and jurisdictional) on the other – latterly, in 2018, the National Hockey League settling group litigation involving 300 former players for close to $19 million. The passage of four, soon-to-be five, years has seen, and will see, advances in medical diagnostic techniques (both in terms of scanning and biomarkers) and more nuanced or sophisticated forms (actual or asserted) of diagnosis.
In this connection, we shall periodically draw the attention of readers of this Blog to what comes up on the radar as matters unfold over the next 12 months and beyond.
Judgment has been handed down in Sateeshkumar v Wigan Council [2026] EWCC 39, in the first appeal on the question of whether a claimant must show causation to rely on Delaware Mansions to argue that the cost of treating Japanese knotweed is a cost of abating a nuisance. The issue follows from the Supreme Court’s…
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Wetherell v Student Loans Company Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 645, where the Claimant relied directly on an EU law directive to obtain damages from his employer for noise-induced tinnitus. Tom Carter and Jessica Woodliffe appeared for the successful appellant. Many noise claims involve exposure which happened…
The long-anticipated judgment in Abbott v Ministry of Defence has now been handed down. Kate Longson, who was instructed as junior counsel to the Ministry of Defence, summarises the key aspects of the judgment. In 2021, Hugh James solicitors issued a Claim Form in the name of David Abbott and approximately 3500 other Claimants for…