...In due course he instructed solicitors, Royds Withy King, and made applications for Industrial Injuries Disablement benefit and for a payment under the Pneumoconiosis (Worker’s Compensation) Act 1979. By this...
...the claim under section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 1957. Most commonly, it is a weapon used during the trial itself to achieve the dismissal of the...
...psychiatric harm) against the defendant, alleging that it was vicariously liable for the rape – the tort of trespass – committed by the elder. At first instance, Chamberlain J held...
...various health and safety regulations to establish liability. He must show that his employer was negligent. The Defendant employer contends that the headset was an industry-standard headset which complied with...
...quality studies of workers and workplaces and also community-based studies regarding both death and long-term effects of infection with SARS-CoV-2. The common denominator here is the wish to see studies that...
...ought to have commissioned a comprehensive inspection of the aircraft prior to it being dismantled. Had they have done so, the cannister would likely have been identified and removed. The...
...April 2005 (two days later). He complied with this advice. On 30 April 2005 the Claimant suffered an ischaemic stroke, as a consequence of which he now sadly suffers severe...
...in accordance with the terminology used by the Bar Standards Board although we consider it more accurately described as an ‘anti-racism’ statement to reflect our ongoing commitment to combat racism....
...the rules of common law. The most obvious “occupier” at common law will be an owner-occupier who both owns and occupies a premises. But it is clear that being the...
...the Defendant owed the Claimant a duty of care to provide him with a safe system of work (i.e. the employer’s common law duty). The standard of care was that...